Please rotate your device to landscape mode to view the table.


Impact Area Impact Expected by Supporters View by Supporters on the Perceived Desirability of this outcome Impact Expected by Opponents View by Opponents on the Perceived Desirability of this outcome Nature of Disagreement
Traffic Congestion Significant reduction Positive, reduces commute times and air pollution Minimal reduction Not a significant issue in some areas 1) Disagree on extent of expected impact
Environmental Impact Reduced emissions and carbon footprint Positive, contributes to sustainability goals Minimal impact Not a major concern in some regions 1) Disagree on extent of expected impact
Cost of Living Reduced transportation costs for commuters Positive, increases disposable income Increased taxes or fees to fund expansion Negative, burdens taxpayers 2) Agree on impact, disagree on desirability
Urban Development Increased density and mixed-use development Positive, promotes walkability and community Loss of parking and increased development costs Negative, disrupts existing neighborhoods 2) Agree on impact, disagree on desirability
Accessibility Improved mobility for underserved communities Positive, promotes equity and economic opportunity Limited impact in certain areas Not a significant concern in some regions 1) Disagree on extent of expected impact
Economic Activity Increased productivity and business opportunities Positive, facilitates commerce and employment Minimal impact on overall economic growth Not a major driver of economic activity 1) Disagree on extent of expected impact
Public Health Improved air quality and increased physical activity Positive, promotes healthier communities Minimal impact on overall public health Not a significant factor in some regions 1) Disagree on extent of expected impact
Government Spending Increased investment in infrastructure Positive, creates jobs and modernizes systems Increased taxes or reallocation of funds Negative, strains public resources 2) Agree on impact, disagree on desirability